possible na... life k define kora. amra three dimension nie chinta korte pari.. at best 4 dimension... [time keo dhore r ki..]
kintu life has n-dimensions...
[here n= purno shonkha..
]
ononto_dhoasha Wrote:possible na... life k define kora. amra three dimension nie chinta korte pari.. at best 4 dimension... [time keo dhore r ki..]
kintu life has n-dimensions...
[here n= purno shonkha.. ]
apni ki kindly ektu detailse bolben what are other three dimension you are talking about....
amar to mone hoi in terms of defining life the 4th dimension which is time has the first priority. Before the right time arrives, man is unkonwn to everything..including the definition of life...Each one will have a different point of view by looking at his own time period in lifetime....
ekta definition dar korano jai...its a process of period of time given by supreme being, ought to be carried by reactable beings in which some universal changes do occure with some biological changes and this process is guranteed to be terminated.
Quote:what is Life?..
Uff.. ei jinish niya bohut kachal dekhsi..... KOnotai pochondo hoenai....
mon moto hoe nai... r bhallagena...
nirob Manush Wrote:its a process of period of time given by supreme being, ought to be carried by reactable beings in which some universal changes do occure with some biological changes and this process is guranteed to be terminated.
...eto kothin kothin kotha koi paiso..?
shohoz bhashae bolte parba..??
dhulo Wrote:nirob Manush Wrote:its a process of period of time given by supreme being, ought to be carried by reactable beings in which some universal changes do occure with some biological changes and this process is guranteed to be terminated.
...eto kothin kothin kotha koi paiso..?
shohoz bhashae bolte parba..??
khikz...nirob manush shohoj kotha bolte parena....eta emon ekta proshon jar kono specific answer hote parena...It has infinite solution..tai ami amar khali khopri theke ekta difition banailam...onek kotha shohoj vabe bola jai but easy to say by making it complex.
Should we have some sympathy towards the AIDs patient? I know it is not a crime to have an AIDs . But i am wondering don they responsible for their own deeds. There are other reasons for behind having AIDs such as blood transfussion but the chances of these possibilities are less compare to the big one. How shoud we consider this deases and as well as the people are having that deases?
Of course we should be sympathetic towards AIDS patients.
yes, it is mainly transmitted through sexual conduct but we should also keep in mind that when we see aids PATIENTS around us,we have no idea how that particular person got it.
maybe the person is innocent and having the diesease itslf is bad enough, let alone the shabby treatment they receive from others...
maybe most people wud not treat them as any other human being but i, for one , wud treat them well without being biased against them..
there r thousands of victims who get it from an unfaithful spouse,many children who get it from mother's blood while in the womb...
so who are we to judge them when we cannot be sure abt how they got transmitted with the diesease?
moreover i personally think that even if a person had acted against the moral standard of behaviour and ended up with the diesease, yet s/he doesnt deserve to be treated shabbily because in the end when a person gets this diesease s/he gets the punishment....
i think thats punishment enough...instead we should try and lessen their pain, if possible...
because, ekta manush jokhon kharap thake amra taader bhalo hote utshaho dei, kintu jokhon tara realise kore j taader kormo gulo kharap chhilo, tokhon shomaj r taake bhalo chokhe dekhe na, taake shongo dite chayna...eita thik na...
oporadh k ghrina koro, oporadhi k noy....